Chris Carson FRICS, FAACE, FGPC, PSP, DRMP, CEP, CCM, PMP

Chris Carson FRICS, FAACE, FGPC, PSP, DRMP, CEP, CCM, PMP

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
12K followers 500+ connections

About

Chris is Enterprise Director of Program & Project Controls and Vice President for ARCADIS…

Articles by Chris Carson

Activity

Join now to see all activity

Experience

  • ARCADIS U.S. Graphic

    ARCADIS U.S.

    Virginia Beach, VA

  • -

    Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

  • -

    London, United Kingdom

  • -

    Central Virginia Chapter

  • -

    West Virginia, United States

  • -

  • -

    United States

  • -

    Morgantown, WV

  • -

    Virginia Beach, VA

  • -

  • -

  • -

  • -

Education

  • University of Virginia Graphic

    University of Virginia

    -

    Founded in 1836, the U.Va. Engineering School is the third oldest engineering school in a public university in the U.S. The School combines research and educational opportunities at the undergraduate and graduate levels as part of the University of Virginia, a consistently top-ranked public institution.

Licenses & Certifications

Publications

  • Ten Biggest Lies in Project Controls

    Cost Engineering Journal, November/December 2018

    While misinformation and poor schedule analysis conclusions can plague construction
    managers, some of the analysis and reporting problems are significant enough that
    they rise to the level of “lies.” Understanding the most frequently encountered lies will
    help construction managers and owners to better understand when there is a need to
    examine the analysis or schedule review reports at a much deeper level. This article will
    discuss the ten biggest lies in project controls that…

    While misinformation and poor schedule analysis conclusions can plague construction
    managers, some of the analysis and reporting problems are significant enough that
    they rise to the level of “lies.” Understanding the most frequently encountered lies will
    help construction managers and owners to better understand when there is a need to
    examine the analysis or schedule review reports at a much deeper level. This article will
    discuss the ten biggest lies in project controls that the authors have encountered over
    the course of their careers. These lies will be examined using “lessons learned” from
    both a project management and a claims perspective. This perspective should provide
    a deeper understanding of the principal areas of schedule analysis and prepare the CM
    or owner to better question and review the statements. This article was first presented
    as CSC.2436 at the 2017 AACE International Annual Meeting.

    Other authors
    See publication
  • Soft Skills are Vital for Effective Project Controls

    Cost Engineering Journal, March/April 2015

    In order to be an effective member of the project management team, it takes good soft skills. These soft skills are necessary to be effective, if the PM team is to listen to recommendations from project controls. Whether its planning projects, capturing update information, addressing risks, discussing corrective actions, or providing claims avoidance support, if the PC expert is not also an expert in soft skills, the value is greatly reduced. This article provides some recommendations for those…

    In order to be an effective member of the project management team, it takes good soft skills. These soft skills are necessary to be effective, if the PM team is to listen to recommendations from project controls. Whether its planning projects, capturing update information, addressing risks, discussing corrective actions, or providing claims avoidance support, if the PC expert is not also an expert in soft skills, the value is greatly reduced. This article provides some recommendations for those skills, personality testing such as the Meyers-Briggs Personality Profile, that are necessary to supplement the technical skills, and offers ways to both train and test for the necessary soft skills.

    Other authors
    See publication
  • Best Practices and Guidelines for CPM Scheduling for Construction

    PMI - Project Management Institute

    This SEI (Scheduling Excellence Initiative) collaboration with the PMI Scheduling Community of Practice provides readers with a reference guide that is like having an experienced scheduling professional at hand.
    The book itself is laid out in a way that follows the phases of building a project schedule: from project planning to project definition and schedule design, to development, maintenance, and usage of the schedule.

    Each of these six sections, from planning through usage, is…

    This SEI (Scheduling Excellence Initiative) collaboration with the PMI Scheduling Community of Practice provides readers with a reference guide that is like having an experienced scheduling professional at hand.
    The book itself is laid out in a way that follows the phases of building a project schedule: from project planning to project definition and schedule design, to development, maintenance, and usage of the schedule.

    Each of these six sections, from planning through usage, is broken up into separate categories for detailed discussion and for easy reference:
    •Definition – defining the topic term
    •Purpose – establishing why the topic is used in the planning and scheduling process
    •Default Conditions – establishing the conditions under which the topic is used and implemented
    •Best Practices – establishing how the topic is used, the application options, and ways the topic is used, including evaluations of the various practices
    •Recommended Practices – establishing preferred application or implementation methods, if any
    •Advisories – establishing what should be avoided in the implementation, and providing lessons learned from the contributors

    As a reference manual, CPM Scheduling for Construction: Best Practices and Guidelines is indispensable to assist schedule technicians and project managers step-by-step in the process of developing, analyzing, and maintaining a project schedule.

    Other authors
    See publication
  • The Value of CM in Pre-Design: Cost Management

    CMAA CM eJournal

    "Hiring a professional construction manager early in the project yields multiple opportunities and impressive savings that are lost if not handled appropriately before design starts. This article explores one aspect of this value, the CM’s role in cost management during the pre-design phase."
    It’s excerpted from paper that was presented at CMAA’s National Conference & Trade Show in October.

    See publication
  • Dealing with Contractors' Schedules that Cannot be Approved

    Cost Engineering Journal, September-October by AACE International

    Too many projects start without approved schedules, and sometimes the schedules are never approved. This raises risks to both the Contractor and the Owner. However, if the risks of approving the schedule are higher than the risks and benefits to the project of approving that schedule, the schedule should be rejected. In the case of rejection, knowing what to do and how to deal with a project that does not have an approved schedule in place can be very important to the success of the project…

    Too many projects start without approved schedules, and sometimes the schedules are never approved. This raises risks to both the Contractor and the Owner. However, if the risks of approving the schedule are higher than the risks and benefits to the project of approving that schedule, the schedule should be rejected. In the case of rejection, knowing what to do and how to deal with a project that does not have an approved schedule in place can be very important to the success of the project and protection of the two party’s interests. This paper addresses the very difficult choices when a schedule is submitted that is substandard and should not be approved.

    See publication
  • An Effective and Ethical Approach to the General Contractor Bid Process

    Cost Engineering Journal May-June by AACE International

    Stipulated sum open market bidding for design-bid-build is still a popular way to handle project delivery. In this highly competitive market, the primary qualification is financial, proven by the ability to post a bid bond, and once that hurdle is met, the contractor is selected by the apparent low bid.
    In the author’s 25 years of experience in various roles in estimating, from materials surveyor to bid captain, he developed a process that could be implemented on all bids, and would allow…

    Stipulated sum open market bidding for design-bid-build is still a popular way to handle project delivery. In this highly competitive market, the primary qualification is financial, proven by the ability to post a bid bond, and once that hurdle is met, the contractor is selected by the apparent low bid.
    In the author’s 25 years of experience in various roles in estimating, from materials surveyor to bid captain, he developed a process that could be implemented on all bids, and would allow for the best possible low bid while still working with a solid base of subcontractors. The process allows for quick resolution of subcontractor selections, achieving this goal at bid time, and allowing the project planning to start immediately after NTP without an extensive process of buy-out.
    This process covers the entire bidding portion of the procurement from initial choice of projects to bid to scope of work evaluations, and at the same time eliminates the need to engage in the risky and potentially unethical bid shopping negotiations with subcontractors.

    See publication
  • Can a Subcontractor Have a Critical Path Delay when the General Contractor Does Not?

    Cost Engineering Journal, December 2011, by AACE International

    What happens when an owner impact extends the time that a subcontractor must remain on the job, but doesn't extend the project completion date? This article discusses the issues, examines existing case law, establishes how experts analyze and prove subcontractor delays, and provides an example of an analysis for this condition.

    Other authors
  • The Great Debate: Planning & Scheduling from Substantial to Final Completion

    Cost Engineering International Journal

    The last one percent of a project can be the most difficult portion to execute. Substantial
    completion is often the first milestone associated with delay computations. The necessary
    work that completes the project allowing final completion is often referred to as “punchlist”
    work, but it is usually the last thing on the minds of the project management team at the beginning
    of a project, which means that it can be the most difficult portion of a project to schedule.
    Punchlist work…

    The last one percent of a project can be the most difficult portion to execute. Substantial
    completion is often the first milestone associated with delay computations. The necessary
    work that completes the project allowing final completion is often referred to as “punchlist”
    work, but it is usually the last thing on the minds of the project management team at the beginning
    of a project, which means that it can be the most difficult portion of a project to schedule.
    Punchlist work can be a source of disputes regarding the final quality of the work, the timing of
    occupancy, the start of warranty periods, and the assessment of delay costs or liquidated damages.
    Many of these activities involve other terms used in scheduling, such as beneficial occupancy,
    building commissioning and final inspection, confusing the completion issues. In what has become
    a tradition at AACE International, the authors have prepared to debate these topics at the
    2009 Annual Meeting. This paper presents an overview of the issues for the debate. This article
    was first published as PS.14 in the 2009 AACE International Transactions.

    Other authors
  • Innovative Program Delivery With Claims Avoidance Planning and Execution

    CMAA National Conference 2009

    Session featuring the North Terminal Development Program at Miami International Airport, with the Owner represented by Tina Millan Clegg, the Program Manager represented by Fernando Gavarrete, Heery/S&G, the Claims Avoidance Project Controls Service Provider, represented by Jim Thompson of Alpha Corporation. This is one of the largest and most complex aviation programs in the U.S.

    Other authors
    See publication
  • Innovative Program Delivery With Claims Avoidance Planning and Execution

    CMAA National Conference 2009

    Session featuring the North Terminal Development Program at Miami International Airport, with the Owner represented by Tina Millan Clegg, the Program Manager represented by Fernando Gavarrete, Heery/S&G, the Claims Avoidance Project Controls Service Provider, represented by Jim Thompson of Alpha Corporation. This is one of the largest and most complex aviation programs in the U.S.

    Other authors
    See publication
  • Schedule Development

    AACE International

    Paper on processes and methods for successful schedule development.

    Other authors
  • Schedule Design

    Paper on the concepts and requirements of schedule design.

    Other authors

Honors & Awards

  • 2015 Fellow of RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors)

    RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors)

    Award based on individual achievement “as well as demonstrating significant career achievements and successes, it demonstrates a passion for developing the industry, sharing knowledge and supporting others in reaching their goals”.

  • 2013 AACE Fellow

    Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) International

    Approval of Fellow is in recognition of professional attainment and significant
    accomplishment in cost management or cost engineering.

  • Presentation Ranked #1

    AACE International 2012 Annual Meeting

    MEMO To: Mr Christopher W Carson PSP
    From: Christian Heller, Staff Director - Technical Operations
    Re: Speaker Evaluation - 2012 AACE International Annual Meeting

    Your presentation received the following evaluation:
    Track ID: PS-1014
    Title: Dealing with Contractor's Schedules that Cannot be Approved

    RANK = 1 of 99
    OVERALL PRESENTATION SCORE: 0.83 [Conference Overall: Min=0.28 Ave=0.65 Max=0.83]


    LEGEND:
    Q1 to Q5 -- 0 to 2, 0=needs to improve, 1=good,…

    MEMO To: Mr Christopher W Carson PSP
    From: Christian Heller, Staff Director - Technical Operations
    Re: Speaker Evaluation - 2012 AACE International Annual Meeting

    Your presentation received the following evaluation:
    Track ID: PS-1014
    Title: Dealing with Contractor's Schedules that Cannot be Approved

    RANK = 1 of 99
    OVERALL PRESENTATION SCORE: 0.83 [Conference Overall: Min=0.28 Ave=0.65 Max=0.83]


    LEGEND:
    Q1 to Q5 -- 0 to 2, 0=needs to improve, 1=good, 2=superior
    Q6 -- %, indicates the number of respondents who replied "YES"
    OVERALL PRESENTATION SCORE -- 0 to 1, 0=worst, 1=best

    Number of evaluations: 65

    Estimated number of attendees: 75 [Conference overall: Min=10 Ave=52 Max=138] Rank = 21 of 99

    Q1: Is technical content appropriate for the audience? (make allowances for the differences between theoretical, basic, and case studies) Score = 1.82 [Conference overall: Min=0.74 Ave=1.37 Max=1.82] Rank = 1 of 99

    Q2: Is technical material presented clearly and with authority?
    Score = 1.85 [Conference overall: Min=0.44 Ave=1.39 Max=1.85] Rank = 1 of 99

    Q3: Does presenter speak with clarity and variety?
    Score = 1.88 [Conference overall: Min=0.27 Ave=1.39 Max=1.92] Rank = 3 of 99

    Q4: Does presenter maintain eye contact and audience interaction?
    Score = 1.85 [Conference overall: Min=0.15 Ave=1.43 Max=1.88] Rank = 3 of 99

    Q5: Are visual aids clear, concise and appropriate?
    Score = 1.71 [Conference overall: Min=0.58 Ave=1.34 Max=1.79] Rank = 5 of 99

    Q6: Would you attend a presentation by this speaker again?
    YES = 100.0% [Conference Overall: Min=36.1% Ave=91.9% Max=100.0%] Rank = 1 of 99

  • Technical Excellence

    AACE International (Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering)

    "This award is given by the Technical Board to recognize outstanding technical contributions to the Association by an individual in the project and cost management community. Technical excellence may be accomplished through significant achievement or contribution to technical division work or administration and by playing an instrumental part in the development of technical products" - AACE website

  • Significant Contributions to the Scheduling Industry

    PMI College of Scheduling (Project Management Institute)

  • Chairman's Award

    CMAA (Construction Management Association of America)

    For contributions to CMAA and the Construction Management Profession

Languages

  • American English

    Native or bilingual proficiency

  • English

    Full professional proficiency

Organizations

  • Boy Scouts of America

    -

    -

Recommendations received

5 people have recommended Chris Carson

Join now to view

More activity by Chris Carson

View Chris Carson’s full profile

  • See who you know in common
  • Get introduced
  • Contact Chris Carson directly
Join to view full profile

People also viewed

Explore collaborative articles

We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.

Explore More

Add new skills with these courses